The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the appeal and pending application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was allowed; the appeal along with the pending application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
versus
SRISHTI AGGARWAL @RASHI SINCE UNSOUND MIND THROUGH HER FATHER PIYUSH AGGARWAL
.....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 05.08.2025
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 05, 2025 /sg/pl
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/08/2025 at 12:03:29
Shivi Aggarwal
Srishti Aggarwal @Rashi Since Unsound Mind
Anil Kshetrapal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
