Appeal against a Family Court order concerning medical treatment for parties' minor daughter with epilepsy. Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the appeal.
Appeal and pending application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
SH. RAHUL CHHILLAR .....Appellant
Through: Ms. Vibhuti, Adv.
versus
SMT. JYOTI CHHILLAR .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 09.12.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 13:16:19
Sehrawat.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
DECEMBER 9, 2025 s.godara/pal
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2025 at 13:16:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order regarding medical supervision and choice of neurologist for the minor daughter requires interference.
Sh. Rahul Chillar
Smt. Jyoti Chillar
Anil Kshetarpal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
