Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against a Family Court judgment was rendered infructuous by a later maintenance order of the same Bench granting maintenance pendent lite of Rs.2 lakhs per month; the appeal and pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MISS PAHAL GIYA (THROUGH HER MOTHER, MRS. SAPNA GIYA) .....Appellant Through: Ms. Payal Chawla, Advocate (DHCLSC)
versus
DEEPAK GIYA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Deep Singh, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 13.11.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 14:34:46
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J .
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J . NOVEMBER 13, 2025/rk/rou
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/11/2025 at 14:34:46
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal survives in view of the subsequent maintenance order dated 29.08.2025 passed in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 186/2019.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Miss Pahal Giya (through her mother, Mrs. Sapna Giya)
Deepak Giya
Anil Kshetarpal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
