Disposed¶18

Saswati Mukherjee v. Prasanta Mukherjee

Delhi HC13 Aug 2025MAT.APP.(F.C.)/246/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court order 13.08.2025; MAT.APP.(F.C.) 246/2018; Saswati Mukherjee v. Prasanta Mukherjee; disposal in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 15.07.2025; interim maintenance CM APPL. 40062/2018; directions CM APPL. 9199/2021; Criminal Revision Petition No. 890/2018 under Section 125 CrPC 1973 disposed in terms of settlement; copy of order to CRP file; liberty for revival; compliances by end of October 2025; bench Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of, alongwith pending application(s), in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 15.07.2025, which forms part of the Decree; Criminal Revision Petition No. 890/2018 likewise stands disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement, with a copy of the order to be placed on its file and liberty reserved to seek revival. ¶18

Saswati Mukherjee Vs Prasanta Mukherjee — Maintenance and Alimony | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the present appeal and its pending applications should be disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 15.07.2025 arrived at between the parties. +1 more

¶11

Court's answer

The appeal is disposed of, alongwith the pending application(s), in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 15.07.2025, which shall form part of the Decree.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

A copy of the order is to be placed on the file of Criminal Revision Petition No. 890/2018 for appropriate and necessary action.

¶18

Key takeaways

Liberty is granted to the parties to file an appropriate application, as permissible under law, for revival in the event that any cause or issue for continuance of the present appeal survives.ratio¶18
Criminal Revision Petition No. 890/2018, arising from proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, shall stand disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement.ratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, JJ.), order dated 13.08.2025 in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 246/2018 (Saswati Mukherjee v. Prasanta Mukherjee) with CM APPL. 40062/2018 (interim maintenance) and CM APPL. 9199/2021 (directions): In view of the Settlement Agreement dated 15.07.2025 reached between the parties, the appeal was disposed of, alongwith the pending application(s), in terms of the Settlement Agreement, which forms part of the Decree. Criminal Revision Petition No. 890/2018 between the same parties, arising from proceedings under Section 125 CrPC 1973 and listed for 09.10.2025, was directed to stand disposed of in terms of the same Settlement Agreement; a copy of the order was to be placed on that file, and liberty was reserved to the parties to seek revival should any cause for continuance of the appeal survive. The parties undertook to complete certain compliances by the end of October, 2025.

¶1

$~12

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 246/2018, CM APPL. 40062/2018 (For Interim maintenance) & CM APPL. 9199/2021 (For Directions)

¶4

SASWATI MUKHERJEE .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Mr. Ajoy Ghosh, Mr. Siddharth Batra, Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Ms. Shivani Chawla, Ms. Archna Yadav & Ms. Preetika Shukla, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

PRASANTA MUKHERJEE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Shukla & Mr. Shashank Prabhakar, Adv. with Respondent through vc

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶10

O R D E R % 13.08.2025

¶11

Learned counsel for the parties state that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, vide Settlement Agreement dated 15.07.2025, the present appeal is liable to be disposed of.

¶12

It is further stated that certain compliances are to be made by the end of October, 2025 and the parties undertake to fulfil the same.

¶13

This Court has been informed that Criminal Revision Petition No. 890/2018 titled as Saswati Mukherjee vs. Prasanta Mukherjee is pending in this Court and is listed for 09.10.2025.

¶14

The parties jointly state that the aforesaid petition arises from proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:28:40

¶17

1973 and shall stand disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement.

¶18

Let a copy of the order be placed on the file of Criminal Revision Petition no. 890/2018 for appropriate and necessary action. 6. Liberty is granted to the parties to file an appropriate application, as permissible under law, for revival in the event that any cause or issue for continuance of the present appeal survives. 7. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of, alongwith the pending application(s), if any, in terms of the Settlement Agreement, which shall form part of the Decree.

¶19

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

¶20

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 13, 2025/ v /va

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:28:40

Saswati Mukherjee v. Prasanta Mukherjee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saswati Mukherjee v. Prasanta Mukherjee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Jain Vs Ishita Jain

Pramod Dutt @ Yogesh Verma @ Avinash Kumar Vs Tarun Verma

Balveen Kaur Vs Gagandeep Singh @ Shankey

Sh. Bhishma Tyagi, through His Spa (Lokendra Tyagi) Vs Mrs. Jyotsna Singh

Harpreet Sawhney Vs Puneet Sharma

Shashi Vs Arya Kumar & Anr.

Sarita Sharma Vs Maya Devi through Savita

Babita Vs Col Dinesh Kumar

Gaurav Gupta & Ors. Vs Union Bank of India

Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Vs Nageshwar Sharma Sole Prop of M/S Sarthak Construction Co.

Manish Jain Vs Ishita Jain

Mukul Khanna Vs Rashmi Khanna

Deepak Mehrotra and Another Vs Axis Bank and Others

Pramod Thatoi Vs Doris Chung Gim Lian & Ors.