A matrimonial appeal concerning access to appellant's daughter was withdrawn by counsel's instruction so that an application could instead be filed before the Family Court regarding meeting the daughter and wishing her birthday. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
versus BALVEEN KAUR @ SIMPI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Aggarwal, Mr. Kunal, Mr. Jatin, Ms. Neelakshi Sharma and Ms. Bhavya, Advs. with Mr. Harbans Singh (Father of the Appellant) in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 08.08.2025
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 08, 2025 /jn/sh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/08/2025 at 12:30:34
GAGANDEEP SINGH @ SHAINKEY
BALVEEN KAUR @ SIMPI
ANIL KSHETARPAL
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
