Appellant sought recall of an earlier court order, claiming contentions were not recorded. Court noted counsel had confirmed dictation in his presence and dismissed the application as abuse of process; Registrar (Listing) asked to explain why it was listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
UMESH CHANDRA SINGH .....Appellant
Through: Dr. Vikas Kumar, Adv.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr. Adarsh Tripathi, Mr. Vikram Singh Baid, Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Yashwardhan Sharma and Mr. Naman, Advs for R 2-10.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV
O R D E R % 12.12.2025 CM APPL. 78662/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:45:26
DINESH MEHTA, J
VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J
DECEMBER 12, 2025/ps
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:45:26
1 issue framed by the court
Should the application seeking recall of the order dated 21.11.2025 be accepted?
Umesh Chandra Singh
Union of India
Dinesh Mehta
Vimal Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
