Disposed¶13

Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Soumitra Sen & Ors.

Delhi HC14 Oct 2025LPA/634/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court DB; LPA 634/2025 withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of Single Judge order dated 09.09.2025 passed in absence of appellant's counsel; contention that issues differ from LPAs 363-364/2025 (IOCL v. Retired Officers Welfare Society); W.P.(C) 13852/2025 revival argument noted; Article 226 equity submission recorded; no merits observations.

What did the court decide?

LPA 634/2025 withdrawn by the Appellant with liberty to approach the learned Single Judge for recall of the order dated 09.09.2025; no observations made on the merits. ¶13

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs Soumitra Sen & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- LPA 634/2025 & CM APPLs. 64739-41/2025

¶4

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED .....Appellant

¶5

Through: Ms. Vineeta Meharia, Sr. Adv., Mr. Amit Meharia, Ms. Tannishtha Singh, Mr. Sambhav, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

SOUMITRA SEN & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

¶10

It is contended by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant that the impugned order has been passed in the absence of the learned Counsel for the Appellant and it is the case of the Appellant that the issue in Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Retired Officers Welfare Society & Ors. in LPAs 363-364/2025 is not similar to the present case. She also states that the arguments regarding the fact that the W.P.(C) 13852/2025 seeks to revive is still pending and amongst other grounds, has not been considered. Since the order has been passed in the absence of the learned counsel for the Appellant, this Court gives suggestion to the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant to approach the learned Single Judge again and to pray for recall of the impugned order. Learned Senior

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/10/2025 at 13:45:28

¶13

Counsel for the Appellant has accepted the suggestions given by this Court and seeks to withdraw the instant LPA, with liberty to move to learned Single Judge for the recall of the order dated 09.09.2025, pointing out that the submissions made by learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the issues are identical is not correct and also that the equitable remedy under Article 226 should not be exercised in the facts of the present case.

¶14

It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations in the merits of the matter.

¶15

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶16

VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J

¶17

OCTOBER 14, 2025 ms

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/10/2025 at 13:45:28

Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Soumitra Sen & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Soumitra Sen & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Kumar & Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Bhavaya Tehri Vs Ahlcon Public School & Anr.

Anita Vs Ryan International School & Anr.

Arjun Patil Vs UOI & Ors.

V Linga Raju Vs UOI and Ors.

Hc Chandra Pal Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.