Appeal concerning absence of reservation in institute/university admissions for wards of serving paramilitary forces personnel. Counsel sought withdrawal after arguing; the Division Bench dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to challenge the relevant provisions afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
REYANSH VARDHAN .....Appellant Through: Mr.Vivek Kumar Tandon with Ms.Laxmi Gupta, Advs.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr.Kshitij Chhabra, SPC for R-1. Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, S.C. with Ms.Aliza Alam, Mr.Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs for R-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
OCTOBER 10, 2025/ S.Rawat
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2025 at 12:12:32
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal could be withdrawn with liberty to challenge provisions denying reservation in admissions to wards of serving paramilitary forces personnel.
Reyansh Vardhan
Union of India & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
