Surajmal Memorial Education Society & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC12 Sept 2025LPA/466/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against a Single Judge's order cancelling MSIT's 2023-24 management quota admissions and reducing its management quota to nil for 2023-24 for flouting prescribed admission procedures. The Court found the appellants curtailed the mandatory notice period and disregarded court directions.

What the court decided

AI extract

Surajmal Memorial Education Society & Anr. Vs Govt… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~
* IN THEGCOURFDLAW
% Judgment rsvo: 31 . 07 .205
Judgment proc: 12 . 09 . 205
+ 3&CM. 946/20LPA
NY& CT D ML EOI J SURA ANR .
ants p Ae l
roug: h T rt i K al, p U Senior
Advocate along with Mr.
Kumar Utkarsh, Adv. for A - 1.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kh, an
Senior Advocate along with
Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Adv. for
A - 2.
s ver
NCDELHI&RS F . T V O G . dtR es po n.
roug: h T M r . Dhuv Rohatgi , Adv. for R
1 &R - 2 .
Ms. Anita Sh,dvcefr o
R - 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICAKP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARIS VAIDYNTH
SHANKR
J UDGMENT
ANIL KSHETRP , J.
1. The prsnt e A eal p il the as etno rc e s of the Judgment
dated 17.05.2023 [hereinafter refe the Impugned r deO “]
ed bythpa s e l dSiar nge Judin W . P(C) No.14678/ 2 and
td ma nec o ers t , rby the admwh e is on ute by the d on c
Ap ant l pe œ Mhrj Sur a jml Ins a t iue of T lgy o echn [ inaft h er
fd toas re —MSIT“ ] under thmo fgQM ac
eion s 2 œ 23 w e rheld to be con tr ayo th e apl icbsuory t
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 1 of 20

¶2

n, is vpr o namely, the Delhi Prinal Co so fe gs or I le uo nsti btn fCh i (Pr o on Fe ita p e , Rgulatinf Adm o ison ,Fixat of Non - ave F it Explo and Other M e ur to Ensure Equity and se a n) At,2Ex cel0 [hereinafter referred to a , as we Delhi Prinal Cofe so gs le or Iuo (Pr nsti btn of c i h o on ita p F e , Regula tion of Adm is on, Fxaton of the Non i - av F it xplo e e and other m e a s ur to nsur Equity & Ex e n) Rules, 2 cel 0 [hereinafter referred to as — th e Ruls “] , adtheciru n s lby oa of Higher Education, GovDi re c t mt of NCT of Delhir ne [her einafter referred to as —GNCTD“] , and Gr Gobind Singh u psth Ind ra versty i Un [hereinafter referred G University“] . By the Impugned de r O , while the admon is lredy a nted g r awpoc i hlag e ntsr ofud, a penltyws im u fSITcgmQ tMan pby osed whr to ”Nil‘ for the succeeding academiœ 24. FACTUL MRIX 2. In det comp or ndt eh is u env old t h es nca, pr ant f lv re cs ibred qu to nic . T he A ant lp e No. 1, ml Su ra j oi Men Soi t Edu c ay(Rgd.), isa e re docy ist g ad in ge n mpartng i iger and pr h inal education. Afe so ant e lp No. 2, MSIT is a self - acg private in f uo tin s tablihd under es the aegis of Aant No. 1e lp , ila f iated to SIP Un G versty, i u Section2(f) of theUGC Act, dn izcog re dpa nrove bythe t(). E eh T fr Al IndiaCouc 3. rmsofhIn te Act m,10%ols frand the R u LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 2 of 20

¶3

sanctioed intake in B.Tech course at MSIT admison under the Mangemt Quota. For the Academi Sesion		wasearmkd	for
2 œ23, MSITundertokhamispcf.
4. On2.09,theDircoaf HigherEducaton,			GNCTD ,
isued acirula directng the portal throug whicinformatregadinavilbty ofseat and	G Universty	to creat an onlie
merit list could be acesd byprosectivaplicnts. Pursant
thero, the	G Universty isued furthecirulasdate
27.09 and14.02seking to ope	rationlse the admison
proces thugporal. Thesciu,awelsth admion
procedu atby MSIT,becam th subjectmarof chaleng
in W.P(C) No. 14678/20 filed by MSIT along with threother
instuo.
5. Around the sa	me time, a separt writ petion, W.P(C) No.
1906/2, wasfiledbyontuShmJg
transpecy in the procesof distrbuon of admison forms.			By
ordedate08.9	, the learnd Single Judge		direct the
conerd ins	tiues to isue the requistaplicton form;tha
direc	tion was compli	ed	with, and t
aperd inthlvcswauimey
duringtheamsocyl(w			k place
in October20)	.
6. Prio theabvculs,MSITn16.092 a list of 69aplicnts who had aplied for admison under the			hadpublise
MangemtQuo.Thrf,SIcdsl			betwn
LPA 46/203			Page 3 of 20

¶4

27.10and	9 .102, andsub	equntly admi62					.
7. On17.02, in the writ procedings			, the l	, the learnd Single
Judge rcoa	primafce	view abouthe impugndcrlas nd
direct the G	Universty toascertin the factul positn
regadin the admison proces		s then underway. Meanwhil, the
G Universty isued furthenotifcas on18.02and
02.1 publishng conslidate list of aplicnts for Mangemt Quotaseat andrequinginstuo tocondut
counselig acordingly. By29.10		MSIT had	MSIT hadsubtanily
completd isanurhMgQ					.
8. T he foregin	sequnc of thesevnts, and the interplay
betwn the stauory schem under the Act			and the Rules	and the Rules			, the
adminstrve directons isued by GNCTD, and					the	sube	quent
cirulas of G	Universty, fomdh backdrpoftheImpugnd
Orde date 17.052	.
PROCEDINGS BFTHLAJU
9. ThewritponsfldbyMSIaum
questiond the validty of thecirulas isue			d by the Directoa of
Higher Education	, GNCTD and	andGSIP Universty in Septmbr						œ
October 20,ndighasmvlbyte uor framewokthe Acand theRuls framedthun. Iwas urged
tha the directonsrequing a centr merit list wer isued at a stage when the admison proceshad		alized portal and conslidate
alredycomend, andthacomplianetherwi was neithr
feasibl norgymd
LPA 46/203						Page	4 of 20

¶5

The larnd Single Judge, upon co e derg the rival in s
i onubm s s andthemrilco p
u mQ thangM SIT d by es fl wcp ro
demi ac s eion 2 œ 23 was contay to the r i s n over g auory t
n, the Act, the Rules framed th is vpr o und, and the er iru c lars
ued by GNCTD and thei s G Unversty. At the same time, i
g r vinh a ed t o hef a c t hen h dst u a dy bnlr e mie n tad
mb. d ,a o c th g usinwer p
1 As a m e asur of penalty, howvr, the l e arnd Single e Judge
upheld the decson of the i G Unversty to r i duc the e
t g e mM an Qu os fMSIT to Nil for th e ng cdi su a
eion s 03 2 œ 24. It is this drecton, along with the f i dgs leading in
ro, w t h e ic forms the subject ma h t er of chang in le the prsnt e
nA p rs P eta L .
CONTEIS FHAPL
12. arnd counsel for the A e L ant l e p coted n ed ha the i t ue s
adin th reg ty n alid v cbtyof theGNCTD i l ap a d culCi r te
9 and 2.0 the qnt e b su fcas i noti ued by the s G
y foh t svUn eri demi ac eion s2 - 23 lredy a d e an st lby
his Cour t . R a n el i c wspd onthe o rde at824 .0 2 3 paed s
in LPA No. 560 2 / 3 iled t Vivekand Profesinal Instiuo of
Profesinal Instiue vs Governmt of NCT o f Delhi , whrin it e
as he w dtuori ly n jc toisuec hdrn .
e l thFu ancr iwspdo LPA No.48/03 2 iledas t Norakshi
Dahiy vs GSIPU , ci on de 2.0 8 3 1 whrin e the Ciculas r
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 5 of 20

¶6

ate d 9, 2.0 9 an .0 7 2 d w .021 4 e r held to be ultra
vires Articles 14 and 19(g) of the u of India ti s on C , as we l as
s prlate fvio the Act and the Rules thun ed f r am .
13. It wasurged ha o te c n th adm iso prce has me nd, o c
the i over ng rules f o r t h eaisn dmcb rdalt e midway. The
t fpr comen blohdis e t r a c nheca t publ of i
ochue of b r G Unversty i for the demi ac eion s 2 - 23,
h ic set out the pw du for admoc er is on, cludg under the in
g e M an t Quoa . A s p erthocu b nid lga,
planisd vrmu t h e A .0 on 2 6 iwsar pn th e
for fng the il t quota. P mane g rsant u ro, 69 h et uden who st
had alied w p e r nlistd, and the said list was published a e t the
bsit of e w h e int sualog wi th e m a rksotined ythem inthe b
fyng ex i qual to. S ina m qntly, the list was frozen on bs eu
, i 2.0 916 . , much bfor the i e uance of s ulas rc i ate d
and7 2.09 , wby tp her c s o fradmi n to ihe
mt g ean Qu ughbe sota w mo di fe .
14. It wasfuthe r co nted h a te Aan pl s d inot dulge in
any unfair pratie c s or pdus to doc er priv any me e us rio t
ite from a d c a n lying for the p mt e g an Qu ota . E xcept for a
dab on c le delay of a few days under Section (1) 4 of the Act
ule to court proc b ri at dings and the delay in creation of the e
Government‘s portal, no violation
edu r o c . Toug the merit list publ h caton was i lay de owing to
qn e b su t ulasi rc ate d 9 and 2.0 9, no pr .02 7 judic e
as w cued , a s t heli had lredy a b e publ hed i s tn wm,ao
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 6 of 20

¶7

complaint wsrecivd		. Registraonud the	Directoa fHigher
Education, GNCTD	Ci	Circula	date 2.09 and G Unive	rsity
Circula date	27.09 began on		18.02 yet the course	- and
instue - specif listdirect by the gov	ct by the governmt wer nevr
provid . Consequtly, hAp			s procedwithsunl
schedul submited on07.12and			as permitd by	the Court
ordeat16.09		Acordingly, fst	- roundcseligwah
on27.10with priointmao to the			G Universty,
folwed by second		- round counselig on 28	œ29.10, both
condute iafre,aindtraspemn			withaldmison
dulyintmaed to the		G	U niversty, whic also aceptd the
prescibd haof		Rs.	20, perstudn.
15. Learnd counsel		next argued	thano punishmet is prescibd
under the Act or	the	Rules	framed therund, and ther efor	the
directon reducing 10% of			the M angemt Q uotaseat of the
Apelant Instiuo for theacdemiseion203			- 24 to	nil is
beyond thscope fjudical revw.Rl			iance was plced on the	case
of *Ahlawt vs.Stae ofHaryn*			1 , wherin twa sheldt	the
C ourt canot impose a punishmet whic is not provide under the Staue. Anohrlimb ofargument isthaepunishmt imposed
on theprscivudathniotheInsiu,athsme
takeswyhrigof			ectivsudnwholbapyg
ayerlat i.	,203	- 24, and	who maybentildo gain admison
in MQ on the ba	basi of	hig scorein CBSEexaminto	withou any
oprtuniyfbeghadls.
1(20) 1SC
LPA 46/203			Page	7 of 20

¶8

Lastly, it wa s ubmi t ed a the nts h pla A d comple wth i
a l nterm o i des pa r ed by the Court, s cludg those in ate d
08.92, 16, 120 7 . and 20. , and
um b g tha noiscefdr .
CONTEIS FH R ESPONDT .1 2
17. N.12bmi tous lfRp earnd Lc
cula Ci r ate d 9 2.0 was ued by the Dii s oa of Higher c tre
Education, GNCTD , with the io p r rovl of the then Hon'ble ap
nster of Higher Education/ DM i eputy Chi ef Mnster i of Delhi . The
bject fthe o said Cicul ra ws to inrduce , liand cy spe tran
ny in the adm efic is on ginst M a mt g ean Quota s in
private uo inst lted afi with SIP Un G versty i , in cnfrmity o
e th wi AcRuls.andh et
18. 1 2 05. yOmi durhebas I t fw G
versty Un i was aointed p as the signatd Agency e D for dutig nc o
ison ad mgi the ln cu e slf - cg I fina uoled st
to it. Aord c ingly, R dt ne spo No. 2 / Dia fc tore Hgher Educaton i ,
GNCTD has lmted role once i h e dt gnaaues i hory is a t ointed, p
and thfo the a er swerig r n dt are not in a p n po es tn to s io
ent upon the maco m n er in wic the adm h is on proce s was
s. pl k byhA ta du e r n
CONTEIS F HE RESPONDT NO. 3
19. Lea rned counsel for Rdt No.spo ne 3 / G versty i Un
d hImpugn te or p su ed r O d ansubmi t ea hte ns hd pla A
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 8 of 20

¶9

cleary flouted the provisn of the Act and the Rules framed therund, as noted in detail by the learnd Sin	n of the Act and the Rules framed			gle Judge. It was
argued thspicon,Alfw
their ownadmsculp,byg
uniformty and transpecy sought to be achi	specy sought to be achievd throug the
Circulasedby		Directoa fH igher Educaton		, GNCTD andthe
G	Universty.
20.	It was furthe conted tha once the Directoa of Higher
Education	, GNCTD	had mandte creation of an onlie portal, the
G	Universty waboundtoperainls thsam inthelar
public nt	erst, otha lapicnts hdequalcsto infrma.
Conslidate merit list wer a	r acordingly published, but the
Apelants dirgthan procedwith counselgthir
own terms, therby creating scope forarbitnesand exclusi					on of
meritouscand
21.	Counsel frthe	GSIP Universty mphadthepnalty
imposed	–reducing thMamQuosetof MSITto				nil for
the acdmiseon203		œ24 –is acoretiv masuinted
ensurcompliane in futre a fromadptingsml race.Itwasubmiedth epunishm		nd to detr otherafiltedinstuo
isnotarby,i declsthnaurof evil,d
isprotnaehgvyf		- compliane.
FINDGS &ALY		IS
2 2 .	Afterconsidghubm		advncebylrcounse
fortheparis	and	upon ersalofthemarilpcedonrecd			, the
LPA 46/203					Page 9 of 20

¶10

ue t i s haie f rvs u oin a scrmd et fied ont h e cor tn s f
t h e dicon rtae in P a graph No. 183 of th ed Impugn r O
rby the lwh e arnd Single Judge, e instead of ig ln e c a the
is on made in the Aadm ademi Se c ion s 2 œ 23 , imposed the
penalty of reducing the Mmt Quota g ane eat of the A s ante lp œ
MSIT to nil fr th o gAamS cdines u 03 2 œ 24. P a graph
183 rof th e un: reads
— c,183. H enistado frg hm A
s ion Se 2 - 2 03 as nu l and void, the 10% Mmt Quota an g e
Seats ofh MITrAdm i n c2 - 2 04 s ruc ed
to Nil,mea n ig rbya the10% M the m tan g e Se a t s h
be fied up by the l signat au de t horiy as per the pdu to be r oc e
f ol wed for fng up the rema il in g 90% eat for the s Aademi c
s ion Se 2 - 2 04. Any advismn, r te a lredy iued by s MSIT, for
m it ng uden st gin the 10% M a mtQuota an g e Seats tand s
el an c “
2 3 . The l arnd Single Judge held e ha the A t ant lp e s failed to
e nsur tspecy and ran ompliane with c the pdu e oc r te a n d m
und e r t hAc and the Rules, andth e aplic bru ars. The Court
noted ha the t indo provi w e by MSIT for d ctons was i l ap
owe than the na r nu time con mi mplad under te Rule 8 of the
Rules , a nd the ansr pl A ocd h u it wgdpth nsel
nc of various ubit se nterm d i rectons i ate d , 2 98 .0
, 7and 2.0 9 1 6
2 4 . From the ecod, i r t is vidnt e t ha the Aants lp e ute d on c
is on in October adm 0 wi 2 hou al t their proce ign s with the
ate li d nslic o t and o s lie portal f n amewok intro r uce by the d
G U versty pn i rsant to the u ulas c i r ate d 9 and 2.0
9 Th .02 7 el d Si n ar ge Jud, inp a graph s 1 œ 145 ofthe
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 10 of 20

¶11

Impugned Order, specifically recor
ate d 8 a .02 6 owed barely two w l e ks for i on of ubm s
lic ap tion forms, contay to the s r auory m t a ndte of ti a ng ra
nu of 18 days mi under Rule 82 )( , thrby ei g qal rm un d e
ad v sec y ni u oprt
25. gph P ar Nos. 1 œ 145 ofthe Impugned r deO sun: read
— 1 4 . T h ef ou r t qes i s reg adinth adm is onmade byMSIT
for th e adm i A c Se s on 2 - 2 03 a ginst t h e gmQuot an M
eat.of 10% s
145. According to MSIT”s own stand, it d ate
26.08.2022 in a ”Daily English‘ newsp Daily H i ‘
ws p n e r . Th elastdfo u b m inpc
to be 1 2.0 9 The advismn r te xpr s d e t ha the cton ap l i
for ms w eail bv nth c iue spo 2 9 .0 8Th
n publhr tis m e a d v ” S ta Th e ‘ d ate 26.08 .2 0 i e
E n g lisred h D a y -
—ADMISSION NOTICE FOR MANAGEMENT QUO
SEAT
In terms o f Di t aof H re c gherEduca i n/Gv. fNCT to of |Delhi
N oti fcans g adin f r e il ng up of 10% Mmt Quota Seats, an g e
ctons are ap l i nvted in th i e form be in the ovi la ices of the f
Instiue upto 29.08betwn 10. a.m to 1.0 p.m The last
for s ubm i on o f ap ctnwil il be1 2.0 9 upto1. p .
CouTh e slig wi n l t a k e plc inthe prmi s of the e In st iue ona
date and t ime to be not i fed on the In st iue w e bsit with rspctto e
th e f ol wingcur s
Mahrj SumlInstie.:
• BBA (Gen.), BBA(B&I), BCA,B.Com. (œ 1st a nd
Shifts , B. EdM - LB - L
Mahrj SumlInstieofTcgy:
• B. Te ),C SITch. ( œ 1s t a nd 2S h if,B . Tec
E ( - 1st Shift and B. Tech. (Lateral E“
2 6 . n Durig thep dcyof rsn e Ap , nipeal ctofd
by t h es n pla A we fon 14p osd i 6 2.0 whrby e his Cour t
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page of 20

¶12

rmid the A t p e e p ant s to fi the M l mt Quota g ean eat for s
A i S c ad e mon s 2 03 œ 24, subjec t o hec ti ton dhain h et vn
of dmal of the is el, such quota would stand ap itd for the or ef
qnt yar.Th e b su G U ersty glpmh acodni v
MSIT t o xrcis e the mt Quota for the g ean M 04 2 œ 25 eion. s
3un 2.0 6t14o r iTh de sa :
— 1. Th is anp cto sl in gdk eto ti rc e h s p on dr t
include 10% man g e t quota eat in the cou s ln seig for 90%
nral g e eat and s a l ow the l nt to ap e ondut the adm c on is
es ag i ntm pr o ch
2. Iue notice. Ms. S s a hni, larnd counsel for r e dt No. 3 spo ne
dhl. acepts noi
3. Mr. Tr i path, l e arnd sta n dig counsel has no object ion to the
hlco. int s md pra y e
4 . M ri tal , ern di o s lcun esta h e mayb e prmi t
to fi l t h e 10% man gqu ot s efrth i acde m s o n
in case the LPA is l owe, he wi d isa l f o rg his 10% t man g e
eat for s the qnt su b e demi year. He sha ac l file an afi dvt to
c. t his ef
5. Our a n io has b t e n drawn to p e a r 29 of the impugned o r
w h reads
"29. During the course of argument, larnd Sta e n dig
Counsel f o r Rdtsp ne - NCT ofDlhi taks e a c tegoril
s ta nd h Ci r cul a d te 2.0 9 isp ctvn e ro
nature and, thfo, in Clause ( er i ) of the Ci r cula the
word ctiv 'p ros e has bn e co n s iuly m en tiod. He
also t k e h c s ta n d he Ci r c ul wob
made a p lic able once the Un i versty crats a portal. e
ording to him, no portal has bA c n cr e atd by the e
versty for the AUn i ademi Se c s ion 2 - 2 03. He
fu r the s ubmit t ha the Unversty has i viat from de the
Ci r cula d ate 2.0 9 while is ung the f ol w up
Ci r cula d ate 2 7 .0 9 Aording to him, no c
eg istr aon wr i e to be done at the Un edn t versty i
v." le
6. Aperusal ofth e or d sh w ta pr i m fac e c thi r ul a ws not
icbe aplt oh e aplnt , u rs tow h ic teapl n hsb e
na l ised . H, ct r apel n t shbrmido
fi l the 10% manet gqu os frth iacde s mo n

¶13

Page 12 of 20

¶14

cas e thLPA is d ,h wi e owa l l f o rg his10% manets g
bqnfor tesu h mi yr.d eac
7. Rdt spo ne No. 3 is at liberty to file an cton ap l i king s e
Rs. tn herb am odifc
List on 7 203. b e bench
l a r iftonc , i squ. erdof th “
2 7 . On 5, 07.2 an nterm o i r de was paed res s g the in tra
verson of Md i mt Quota e g an eat to the G s nral Quota until e
cons. i d rt hfu e Thun rde sa m :
—1. List the matter for hearing on 05.
2. Th et an gmMQuo a t h s e l not b ed ivr t oth e Gnral
Quot a xd at s ilhen
3. The date of 25.08.2025, stands canc
2 8 . It may be noted ha the A t ants placed r l e p lianc on the e
vson Bench judgment i D ate d 3 in 84 2.0 LPA No. 56/ 23
captioned Vivekand Profesinal Instiue v. Govt. of NCT of
Delhi , whrin the Court obs e rvd e ha the o t de r ate d 9 2.0
ued byi s h e t af H or cDigherE i ucaton, GNCTDha d n otb
shown to have bn i e ued by a comp s n au et horiy and t ha, t
qutly, any action taken p n sco e rsant u ro woul et h d be wihou t
sdcton. jur i lianc was also placed on the decR e son i ate d
in LPA No. 48 2.0 8 3 1 /03 2 captioned Norakshi Dahiy v.
GSIP Universty , w he rtD n vso ihrte cBad viewha t
the c sul a i r 2.09, te d 7 and4.0 1 0 c. 2 uldnt o
be prd into s es rvic so as to d e fat adm e is on ha had t lredy a
me nd. c o
29 . e vr, thHow s e ervatin ca s b o ot n dvnce the case of the a
snt Apr e ants, inasmuch as the l e p G versty itself, by a Un i
LPA 4 6 / 2 03 Page 13 of 20

¶15

contemprausciruladate 2 the impugned directons, and thesubeqnt Divson Bench rulings have alsoemphasizd the necsity of ensurig transpecy in the manget quota admison byrequingcompliane with the	2.09,reitad and adopte
procedu nthAa	Rule s.
3 0 . Althoug isCourt enaisomresvatingd the coretnsof the findg of the learnd Single Judge as to the
competn fhDirecto suthe cirlad2.09, the
isue has since benrend acdemi	. This	is becaus the G
Universty,bauqcirlofthesam d(AnxurP		- 9),
reitad hosdirectn, w	stand upheld inLPA Nos.563 and
482of03.
3 1 . Furthe, wifcrom 13.042,anAdmisoRegultry
Comitehasbn stauorybd,theComicntepladurtheciruladte	dulyconstie.Bvrf thecaions
2.09standubmeolgripvc		.
3 2 . The	Appellants‘	argument that th
admison prce	- session,	and that —the ru
be cha	nged midway,	“ does not persu
princle is we	- setld, it canot be invoked to justifyn
compliane with stauory rules and bindg judical direct recod discloetha the Apelants not only curtailed theminu		ions. The
periodscbunRle 8(2) with counselig indisrega ofsubitnginterm ordes of this	(a) oftheRuls	, butalsoprced
Court. Thecniafp	tice hasbnld
LPA 46/203		Page 14 of 20

¶16

t ha no puishmet is p n scibd in the Act or re

¶17

Rules, is equay l

¶18

3 3 . On the contay, l r arnd counsel for the R e dt n spo e s , has

¶19

rightly pointed out, Rule 8(2)(a) notice, w h ic was ely not complied with. Fumi td a the, Rule 8 r

¶20

ipulae tha a st l is onto the adm mt g ane Q uota sh al remin

¶21

snal, subject to r i vpr o fcon by the ati signat agency. The de

¶22

Appellants‘ unilateral process, co provis udb ecat s, on i . Rn: d c tras x8il e u — 8. Amen of l o t eat . s - (1) Amen of l o t s eat in an un - ai d e esinal cgtu p ro fhbmd hu.wi se f or a c (2) Ev er y in s t u oha inort y s u,hapvdef l eat in r s spct of e t quota, wards of d man g e fnc p e rso n l, e erson withdabl ymcp : - atn gm) M e ( - (C) T ar mn o Sc ihe yfgs t t b man g e ody of the in s t uo sha l furnish an afi dvt to the signat agency, me de n t i og thrin e t ha they have f ol wed the du laid down in the Act and thp r oc e s rules in a e spe tran er and ma n t ha they have done so wi t hou any prjudic or e u nde ur. Such an afi dvt sha l ompny the list of ac efl suc s uand i te cr m gq o , t b e l d gw iht Unvrsy rl d owsubm ain th e - i ).clause (v i () The in s t uo sha l advrtis the adm e is on notice for et man gquos eats inlwod gy a r, n esp rE in H datheogls pym the institution‘s website and the ins u co n sp i.Th admla e ison tce sha le d bispl a yt le a for t nigh bfor the last date for closing of adm e is on for the rd course in the Un ne o c versty and sha i l include thrin e in f o rmat n s ary for the c e st uden sking adm e is on to t quota man g e eat. The adm s is on notice sha l include the rein t he pl acfromwi d s n lbea v i,t hd m and maer for n s ubm i on of compltd e ap ctons and the l i sch e various adm is es proc l cou n seig. ctiv Prosp e licnts sha ap l be given a period of at least eig ht e

¶23

Page 15 of 20

¶24

days to aply forseat under themanget quota, in the aforemntid .
(i) Whilecaluting themangetseat, fraction lesthan 0.7 *shal bei*gnordvtcfu.
(iv) Basedonthagremkso the qualifyng examinto, theinstuoconerd shal *prea and display the rank o**rde*merit list of suchaplicnts on the institution‘s	btainedyqulfapicts webs	ite and notice board
theinstuo, withn two days of the closing date for recipt of the *manget quotaaplictons. The critea for rank ordeing of applicants wi*	th a	tie in the qualifyin
shalbetsame thoselaidownithe admisonbrchue
laid ownbythesgur.
(v) B*asedonthmrilwup,sonce*dha condut admison counselig for alotmen of branches/ou to qualifed pcntswhroe daysfrwingupo the me rit list of qualifedmangetquotaplicnts. Such admison counselig wil, howevr,bsuject to the condittha thersal
selig wisuject to the c *notbemrhatwo undsfcelig.Thstofaplicnwh wilbe caled for a given round of admison cou displayed on*	the	nselig shalbe institution‘s websit
conspiulae.
(vi) Folwing thecondut of admison counselig, the list of aplicntsdmeothang qusemad onthebas of the merit list dr awn up in the aforemntid maner and the balnce of themanget quotaseat in each course shalbe
publis*hedatnof eachrudonsligthewbof instuo awelhft dsignaecy.Aopfsuh lit sha* bedisplaye on the notice board of thedesignat agency as welastha of theinstuo, kept at aconspiuplace for the informat of the candites and others. The list of the candites
being caldforthe isroundf cselighab aforemntid maner along with the merit list,indcatg therin the date, time and place at whic the counselig wilbe held. The date, time and place of the second round of counselig wilbe displaye ongwithelist ofcand of cunselig: Providetha the second round of counselig shal comen only twelv hoursafte publiconfthelis ofaplicntsdmein the first round of counselig and the discplne/our sea ts. (vi)Thelastdofilupthemang quosetwil nie calendr days after the last date forregula admison in the Universty adhco	es admitnthefirs ound	displayenth - wise balnce of

¶25

Page 16 of 20

¶26

) A i (v l adm is on made to the t quota man g e eat sha s be l
pr o v i s na l d w ilne r at fob cyhd s g ,wi
wi l convey its dec i son w i thn a day of being informed by the
in s t uo of the list of efl c suc ites and the ba a n d s i of their
umhbf. prdction al se
(ix) The a i lated uo sha inst not be authorized to admit l
s andit ecg t h e man gquo t sea r hecutf t
n toub ed a s mf i x - vi )bo.cl a us e (

¶27

¶28

Page 17 of 20

Surajmal Memorial Education Society & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Surajmal Memorial Education Society & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swarnim Vs Navraj

Gaurav Gupta & Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sudha Jaina Vs Dr Er Rajainderr Jaina

Sushma Ghai & Anr. Vs Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Sewa International Fashions Ltd. Vs Kalawati Mathrani (Dead) Thr Legal Representatives

Shrikant Chaudhary Vs M S Value Line Interiors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.