A letters patent appeal raising the same challenge as a companion appeal already dismissed by the Division Bench was dismissed on the ground that the earlier judgment completely covered the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~94
AKSHAY KUMAR
....Appellant
Through: Ms. Mrinal Elker Mazumdar, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
%
O R D E R 03.03.2025
1. LPA 127/2025, which challenges the judgment dated 31 January 2025 of the learned Single Judge which is impugned in the present LPA, stands dismissed by us on 21 February 2025.
2. The judgment completely covers the case. Accordingly, this appeal is also dismissed.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
MARCH 3, 2025/ dsn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:30:38
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
LPA 127/2025Relied on¶1
Akshay Kumar
Union of India
C. HARI SHANKAR
AJAY DIGPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
