Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-1 v. M/S. Avaya India Private Ltd.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2025ITA/426/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court closed this income tax appeal regarding transfer pricing benchmarks as academic. Since the Revenue accepted the adjustment would be nil even if the disputed company were included, the court declined to decide the legal question as raised.

What did the court decide?

The appeal closed; the substantial question of law left open for a more appropriate case.

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-1 Vs M/S. Avaya India Private… — Income Tax | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~85

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ITA 426/2022

¶4

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 .....Appellant Through: Mr Vipul Agrawal with Ms Sakashi Shairwal and Mr Akshat Singh, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S. AVAYA INDIA PRIVATE LTD. .....Respondent Through: Dr Shashwat Bajpai with Mr Sarthak Tripathi, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 11.09.2025

¶10

This petition was admitted on 10.12.2024 on a solitary substantial

¶11

question of law which we reproduce as under:

¶12

“A. Whether the Tribunal, in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, has erred in excluding RS Software (India) Ltd. as a comparable for benchmarking the international transaction, without appreciating the act that the said company is functionally similar to the assessee and qualifies all the filters applied by the TPO?”

¶13

On 25.02.2025, this Court, by noting the submission of Mr. Vipul Agrawal, learned Senior Standing Counsel to take instructions on the submissions made by Dr. Sashwat Bajpai, had adjourned the matter.

¶14

Today, Mr. Agarwal has placed before us a communication dated 21.03.2025 which is an intraoffice communication from the Deputy

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:20:45

¶17

Commissioner of Income Tax, Transfer Pricing Officer-1(1)(1) to the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD) Circel-1(1), New Delhi, wherein inter alia the following has been stated:-

¶18

“Thus, the margin of the assessee falls within the arm’s length tolerance range even if RS Software Limited is included in the final list. Thus, due to exclusion of above 3 comparables, the assessee’s PLI falls within the arm’s length tolerance range and the adjustment would be Nil even if RS Software Ltd is included in the final list. Hence the exclusion or inclusion of the comparable RS Software Ltd. would have no bearing.”

¶19

Though, it is also stated that this Court may decide the issue of the comparable RS Software Ltd on merits, but in view of the stand taken that even if RS Software Ltd is included in the final list, the adjustment would be nil and as such the exclusion or inclusion of the RS Software would have no bearing, we are of the view that the issue being academic, the present appeal need to be closed, leaving the substantial question of law as framed in the order dated 10.02.2024 open, to be decided in a more appropriate case.

¶20

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶21

VINOD KUMAR, J

¶22

SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 rt

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:20:45

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-1 v. M/S. Avaya India Private Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-1 v. M/S. Avaya India Private Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ansal Housing Limited (Formerly Known as Ansal Housing and Construction Ltd) Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 Vs Inflow Technologies (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Maharishi Technology Corporation Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 16(1) Delhi & Ors.

Mrs Shashi Garg Vs Union of India through Secretary, Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance, Government of India &

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -10 Delhi Vs Pinnacle Clothing Company

Praveen Gupta Vs Dcit Circle Intl Taxation (1) (3) (1), New Delhi