Appeal withdrawn at counsel's request so that applications could instead be filed in the underlying suit to remove defendants from the memo of parties and trim pleadings. Court disposed of the appeal and pending application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TANVI TRADING AND CREDITS PVT LTD AND ORS.
.....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rikky Gupta Adv, Ms. Ruchira Arora and Ms. Ananya Singh, Advs.
versus
SONAKSHI GUPTA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Ms. Bijaharini G. and Mr. Jaisal Baath, Advocates for R-1,4 and 5.
Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Vedansh Vashisht, Mr. Swapan Singhal, Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Ms. Khushboo Mittal, Advocates for R-2,3,7 and 8.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 27.11.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/12/2025 at 12:55:53
paragraph no.3 of the plaint.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. NOVEMBER 27, 2025 /sp/hr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/12/2025 at 12:55:53
Tanvi Trading and Credits Pvt Ltd and ors.
Sonakshi Gupta and ors.
Anil Kshetarpal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
