Yerram Balakrishna Trading as M/S Bhagyalaxmi Industries v. Meenakshi Goel
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court, FAO (COMM) 71/2025, decided 11.03.2025, coram Navin Chawla and Tejas Karia JJ.; commercial suit CS (Comm.) No.384/2024 (M/s Bhagyalaxmi Industries v. Robocura Wellness / Meenakshi Goel); appeal against interim injunction order under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 and Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC; prayer confined to expedition of trial; Trial Court requested to decide Suit within six months; Local Commissioner for evidence permissible; no opinion on merits; 10-day filing and refiling delay condoned; CM APPLs. 14775-14778/2025 disposed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of with a request to the learned Trial Court to expedite adjudication of the Suit; liberty to appoint a Local Commissioner for recording evidence; endeavour to dispose of the Suit within six months from its first listing pursuant to the order; connected CM APPL. 14775/2025 also disposed of.