Appeal against an interim direction under Section 19 of the MSMED Act to deposit 75 percent of the awarded amount was withdrawn to pursue a review petition before the District Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~119
Through: Mr. Pratap Sahani, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Mr. Rahul Gujral, Advs.
versus
ANIL KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: No appearance given.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R
% 10.09.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:19:48
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 RT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2025 at 14:19:48
Sushila Sharma
Anil Kumar Sharma
V. Kameswar Rao
Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
