Appeal against partial interim injunction in a property suit. Respondents stated no intention to construct further or create third-party interests. The High Court modified the impugned order directing both sides to maintain status quo, restraining new construction and third-party interests until disposal by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
SANDEEP DEMBLA .....Appellant
Through: Ms. Kirti mewar and Ms. Kirti Sharma, Advocates.
versus
RAJINDER SINGH AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-3 to R-5. Mr. Pulkit Singh, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2025 at 15:02:54
third party interest in the property. However, the relief for restraining the respondents /defendants from carrying out any further construction in the property was not allowed. Aggrieved, the appellant/plantiff has filed the instant appeal.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2025 at 15:02:54
the matter as expeditiously as possible.
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
NOVEMBER 7, 2025/rs
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2025 at 15:02:54
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's partial grant of interim injunction, refusing to restrain further construction, warranted interference in appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Dembla
Rajinder Singh
Chandrasekharan Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
