This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
ANIL KUMAR & ANR. .....Appellants
Through: None.
versus
SMT. NEETA JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. RM Tiwari and Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
O R D E R % 15.12.2025
appellants when their counsel sought discharge on account of no instructions.
appellant on the last date, i.e. on 18.11.2025. However, no adverse order was passed. The case was adjourned to this date to enable the
appellants either to appear in person or through their counsel
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2025 at 13:26:49
concerned to address arguments.
prosecuting the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J
DECEMBER 15, 2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2025 at 13:26:49
Anil Kumar & Anr.
Smt. Neeta Jain
Other respondents
Chandrasekharan Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
