Dismissed

Raj Kumar Anand v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Sept 2025EX.P./36/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A decree holder's grievance was directed at a Government of NCT of Delhi order issued pursuant to Central Administrative Tribunal directions. With amicus assistance the court advised that CAT was the appropriate forum, and the petitioner withdrew the execution petition with liberty to approach CAT.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner to approach the CAT, without prejudice to rights and contentions.

Raj Kumar Anand Vs Union of India & Ors. — Execution and Attachment | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~O-42

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- EX.P. 36/2025 & EX.APPL.(OS) 614/2025

¶4

RAJ KUMAR ANAND

¶5

.....Decree Holder

¶6

Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Varma and Mr. Raj Kumar Anand with petitioner inperson.

¶7

versus

¶8

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms.Shreya Jetly, Adv. for R-1. Mr. S.K. Mishra and Mr. Harsh Kumar Pandey, Advs. for R-2 & R-3. Mr. Anand Prakash Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Varsha Arya, Adv. for R-7 & R-8 Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, amicus curiae

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶10

O R D E R % 01.09.2025

¶11

The Court has considered the assistance rendered by Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, learned senior counsel who has been appointed as amicus curiae to assist the Court.

¶12

On hearing, Mr. Pushkarna, the Court finds that the primary grievance of the petitioner is against the order dated 03.09.2024 which has been passed by the Government of NCT of Delhi in pursuance to the directions passed by

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/09/2025 at 12:04:37

¶15

the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in OA NO.4069/2023 dated 21.12.2023.

¶16

Mr. Pushkarna, therefore, points out that if the petitioner has any grievance, CAT would be an appropriate authority to adjudicate the same. 4. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner who appears in person seeks liberty to withdraw the instant execution petition with further liberty to approach the CAT for redressal of his grievance.

¶17

Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.

¶19

The Court acknowledges and appreciates the valuable assistance provided by Mr. Pushkarna.

¶20

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J SEPTEMBER 01, 2025/P/SPH

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/09/2025 at 12:04:37

Raj Kumar Anand v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Anand v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joint Venture of Bgs Sgs Soma Vs Nhpc Ltd.

Sorin Group Italia S.R.L Vs Neeraj Garg

Mr. Naresh Kumar Vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

M/S Pratham Infratech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs M/S Conocedor Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.

Sangeet Gupta Vs Deepak Gupta & Ors.

Millennial Export House Vs S.S.Industries