Appeal against a Single Judge's order in an execution petition permitting the decree holder to file a reply and staying sale of the property as an ad-interim measure, with a short date fixed. The Division Bench found no ground to interfere and dismissed the appeal.
None granted; appeal and pending application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SMT OMWATI KOAK .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Adv.
versus
CHARAN PAL SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Mr. Himansh Yadav and Mr. Madhav Chaudhary, Advs. for R-2 to R-8.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR
O R D E R % 11.11.2025
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
RENU BHATNAGAR, J.
NOVEMBER 11, 2025 /sp/kv
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2025 at 12:19:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Division Bench should interfere with the Single Judge's ad-interim stay of property sale and adjournment of the execution petition.
Smt Omwati Koak
Charan Pal Singh & Ors.
Anil Kshetarpal
Renu Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
