Disposed¶16

Navita Arjun Vohra v. Nitin Arjun & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Feb 2025CS(OS)/787/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of suit; Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC; I.A. 2996/2025; CS(OS) 787/2015; Navita Arjun Vohra v. Nitin Arjun & Anr.; plaintiff appeared through video-conferencing; identification by counsel; no undue influence or coercion; quietus to disputes; suit disposed of as withdrawn; next date 24.03.2025 cancelled; Delhi High Court; Subramonium Prasad, J.; order dated 04.02.2025.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal application I.A. 2996/2025 under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC allowed; suit CS(OS) 787/2015 disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any; next date fixed in the matter (24.03.2025) cancelled. ¶16

Navita Arjun Vohra Vs Nitin Arjun & Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~61

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 787/2015

¶4

NAVITA ARJUN VOHRA .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Mr. Kaustubh Chaturvedi, Advocate with Plaintiff in person through video-conferencing

¶6

versus

¶7

NITIN ARJUN & ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchira, Advocate for Defendant No.1 Mr. Kamal Kapoor, Advocate for Defendant No.2

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶9

O R D E R % 04.02.2025 I.A. 2996/2025

¶10

This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC on behalf of the Plaintiff for withdrawal of the suit.

¶11

The application states that the Plaintiff does not want to pursue the suit and prays that a quietus be given to the disputes between the parties.

¶12

The Plaintiff has joined the proceedings through video-conferencing. She has been identified by the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff states that she has read and understood the contents of the application and she wishes to withdraw the suit without any undue influence or coercion.

¶13

In view of the statement given by the Plaintiff, who has joined the proceedings through video-conferencing, this Court is inclined to allow the

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:59:51

¶15

application under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC.

¶16

The suit is disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any.

¶17

The next date already fixed in the matter, i.e., 24.03.2025, stands cancelled.

¶18

The application is disposed of.

¶19

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 hsk

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:59:51

Navita Arjun Vohra v. Nitin Arjun & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navita Arjun Vohra v. Nitin Arjun & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Satya Parkash & Brothers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Kamlesh Gola Vs Harish Kumar Goela & Ors.

M/S Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. Vs M/S Ckk Catering Services, & Ors.

Narender Jaisinghani & Others Vs M/S Rebbok India Co.

Soni Gupta Vs Gaurav Garg & Ors.

Motiwala Foundation Charitable Trust Vs Smt Monica Gupta & Ors.

Shri Gopal Krishan Dua Vs Shri Darshan Kumar Dua & Anr.

Akriti Gupta & Anr. Vs Anil Kumar Gupta & Anr.

Dinesh Sharma Vs Ramjas School and Ors.

Anushree Shahoo Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ms. Indu Vs Union of India & Anr.

Rajesh Kumar Vs Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Ors.

Kerala Education Society Senior Secondary School & Anr. Vs Directorate of Education

Shri Virender Sehrawat & Anr. Vs Shri Alok Tiwari & Ors.