Disposed

Neena Miglani v. Asheesh Arora

Delhi HC13 Oct 2025CS(OS)/717/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Parties settled their disputes through mediation. The court found the settlement agreement lawful, decreed the suit in its terms, and directed State Bank of India to release PPF and pension account amounts equally to both parties, with refund of full court fees.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed per settlement; bank to release PPF and pension amounts equally; certificate of 100% court fee refund issued.

Neena Miglani Vs Asheesh Arora — Succession and Inheritance | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~32

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 717/2024 & I.A. 38687/2024

¶4

NEENA MIGLANI .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dwapayan Gupta, Advocate. versus ASHEESH ARORA .....Defendant Through: Mr. Harish Kumar Mehra, Advocate.

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

% 13.10.2025

¶8

The parties have settled their disputes in the mediation proceedings before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

¶9

The Settlement Agreement dated 28^th August, 2025 (hereinafter ‘Settlement Agreement’), which bears the signatures of the plaintiff and the defendant, has been placed on record.

¶10

I have gone through the terms of the Settlement Agreement and find the same to be lawful.

¶11

Parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

¶12

Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement shall form part of the decree.

¶13

Let the decree sheet be drawn up.

¶14

Counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff draws this Court’s attention to the following clauses of the Settlement Agreement:

¶15

“'(ii) Approx. ₹85,38,389/- (Rupees Eighty Five Lakhs Thirty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Nine Only) lying as on 31.03.2024 in the PPF (Public Provident Fund Account) having A/c no.

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

CS(OS) 717/2024

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:16:41

¶19

33039720442 as with State Bank of India, branch Guru Harkishan Nagar, Delhi.

¶20

(iii) Approx. ₹61,277/- (Rupees sixty one thousand two hundred and seventy seven only) lying as on 06.06.2025 in Pension Account bearing PPO NO. (713179000350) A/C No. 51024898439, State Bank of India, Jawala, Heri Branch.

¶21

(v) That, the Amount lying in PPF (Public Provident Fund Account) and Pension Account of the deceased shall be equally divided between both the parties within 3 months of the signing of this settlement agreement. Both the parties agree to sign all necessary documents which may be needed for withdrawal of the said amounts and sharing them equally.

¶22

In view of the above, the State Bank of India is directed to release the amount lying in the aforesaid accounts equally in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant.

¶23

Accordingly, the concerned branches of the State Bank of India are directed to release the amount in the said bank account, equally in favour of the plaintiff and the defendant. 10. The pending application stands disposed of. 11. Since the matter has been settled between the parties in mediation proceedings, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of 100% of the Court Fees in favour of the plaintiffs, in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 89 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶24

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶25

OCTOBER 13, 2025/ at

¶26

Page 2 of 2

¶27

CS(OS) 717/2024

¶28

Neena Miglani v. Asheesh Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neena Miglani v. Asheesh Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Rani (through Gpa Holder) Rajeev Sethi Vs Chand Bibi Aggarwal Dharmarth Trust

Smt. Sumita Chakraborty Broomes Vs Sh. Bijit Chakroborty & Ors.

Mohit Beniwal Vs Dainik Bhaskar and Ors.

Santosh Lakra Vs Bijender Pawar & Ors.

Ms Paridhi Aggarwal Vs Mr Ram Kumar Aggarwal & Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs Mrs. Khushboo Singh & Ors.

Master Devansh & Ors. Vs Smt. Santosh Devi & Ors.

Jagwinder Singh Khurana and Anr. Vs Smt. Tejinder Kaur Baweja & Anr.

Dev Narain Paswan Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

M/S. M2K Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. through Its Authorised Representative and Anr. Vs North Delhi Metro Mall Pvt. Ltd. (Earlier Known as Mgf Metro Mall Pvt. Ltd.) and Anr.

Mr. Neeraj Gupta Vs Mr. Harish Kumar & Anr.

Smt. Mitlesh Gupta Vs M/S Radha Kishan Gobind Ram Ltd.

Labotek Vs Ministry of Earth Sciences through Director, Ncmrwf & Anr.

Idfc First Bank Limited Vs Hitachi Mgrm Net Limited