Suit over property; the plaintiff sought leave to withdraw under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC, abandoning her claim in the suit property. The application was taken on record and the suit was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SMT. SAROJ SHARMA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ram Kumar and Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocates. Mr. Ravinder Sharma, husband of the plaintiff.
versus
SH. MAHINDER SHARMA AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for LRs of D-1 and D-3. Mr. Imam Ahmed, Advocate for D-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 18.08.2025
CS(OS) 630/2018
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2025 at 12:24:36
property.
CS(OS) 630/2018
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 18, 2025
Vivek/-
CS(OS) 630/2018
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2025 at 12:24:36
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Saroj Sharma
Sh. Mahinder Sharma and Ors.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
