Disposed¶28

Mrs. Shashi Bala Amar v. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Kukreja & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Dec 2025CS(OS)/622/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Consent decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC; decree in terms of Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 07.12.2025; essentials of a lawful compromise (lawful, written, signed); voluntariness of settlement; Delhi High Court civil suit; Shashi Bala Amar v. Bharat Bhushan Kukreja; Demand Drafts Rs. 2.10 crore handed over in court; withdrawal application allowed; decree sheet to be drawn up.

What did the court decide?

Civil suit decreed in terms of the Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 07.12.2025; Registry directed to draw up the decree sheet; civil suit along with pending applications disposed of. ¶28

Mrs. Shashi Bala Amar Vs Dr. Bharat Bhushan Kukreja & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~O-69

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 622/2021

¶4

MRS. SHASHI BALA AMAR

¶5

.....Plaintiff

¶6

Through: Mr. Rajat Navet, Mr. Kushagra Pandit and Mr. Rajat Rana, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN KUKREJA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Adv. for D-1, 5 & 6. Mr. Manit Moorjani, Adv. for D-2. Mr. Dhiraj Sachdeva, Mr. Ravi Krishan Chandna and Mr. Udbhav K. Garg, Advs. for D-3.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 10.12.2025

¶13

I.A. 30930/2025 (for withdrawal)

¶14

For the reasons stated in the application, the same stands allowed.

¶15

Let the amended memo of parties be placed on record.

¶16

Application stands disposed of.

¶17

I.A. 30929/2025 (Joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC)

¶18

Heard.

¶19

The parties are appearing virtually or physically, except Mr. Sanjay Kumar Amar. He, however, was present at the time of execution of the Family Settlement. His signatures are affixed.

¶20

The parties submit that in terms of the Memorandum of Family

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 11:49:20

¶23

Settlement dated 07.12.2025, the suit be decreed.

¶24

The Demand Drafts of Rs.2.10 Crore (in the name of 70 Lac each of the plaintiff) is handed over during the course of hearing. A photocopy thereof has been placed on record.

¶25

Order XXIII, Rule 3 authorises the Court to pass a decree on a compromise wherein the parties to the dispute have made an arrangement to settle the dispute. It has been comprehensively stated in the provision that the settlement arrived at should meet the essentials laid down therein, namely, (i) the compromise is lawful (ii) it is reduced in writing (iii) it is duly signed by the parties arriving at the compromise.

¶26

The settlement has been agreed upon without fear or coercion and the parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition.

¶27

The Court is satisfied that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties following due procedure and meeting the essentials specified Order XXIII, Rule 3. Therefore, the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid settlement agreement.

¶28

In view of the aforesaid, the civil suit stands decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.

¶29

The Registry is directed to draw-up a decree sheet.

¶30

The civil suit along with the pending applications, stands disposed of.

¶31

The next date fixed i.e., 22.12.2025 before the concerned Joint Registrar stands cancelled.

¶32

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶33

DECEMBER 10, 2025/P/MJ

¶34

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 11:49:20

Mrs. Shashi Bala Amar v. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Kukreja & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Shashi Bala Amar v. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Kukreja & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Sunil Kumar Gulati Vs Shri Anil Kumar Gulati & Ors.

Vijay Sakhuja Vs Ajay Sakhuja & Anr.

Gurdeep Singh & Ors. Vs Chetan Sharma & Ors.

Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Sajida Khanam Vs Salman

Smt. Geeta Sharma Vs Sh. Gulshan Sharma & Ors.

Sh Praveen Kumar Jain & Ors. Vs Sh Sunil Kumar Jain & Ors.

Ms. Ahana Wasan & Ors. Vs Sh. Anuj Wasan & Ors.

Anil Khubchandani Vs Apollo Green Energy Ltd.

M/S Brompton Private Limited Vs M/S Raj Builders Private Limited

Mrs. Bimal Gupta Vs Mrs.Vaneeta

Tek Chand Memorial Educational Trust Regd. Throgh Its Trustee Sh. Mayank Mann Vs Mohan Lal Gupta & Anr.

Livfin India Private Limited Vs Ugro Capital Limited

Rajeshwari Thakur & Anr. Vs Vishal Singh Thakur