Parties settled their civil suit dispute by a written settlement agreement dated 17.10.2025. The court found the compromise lawful, in writing and signed voluntarily, and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement under Order XXIII, Rule 3 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-63
Through: Mr. Aditya Wadhwa and Ms. Swastika Thourwal, Advs.
versus RAJAN DHAM & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Nanita Sharma and Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Mr. Piyush Wadhwa and Mr. Harsh Kumar Singh, Advs. for D-7.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 18.11.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:32:03
parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2025/P/KSR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:32:03
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the settlement agreement dated 17.10.2025 satisfies the essentials of Order XXIII, Rule 3 CPC so the suit may be decreed on compromise.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rita Bhagwati & Anr.
Rajan Dham & Ors.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
