Suit dismissed for want of prosecution after the plaintiff failed to appear before the court and repeatedly before the Joint Registrar over multiple hearings from 2021 to 2025. All pending applications also stood dismissed under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-27
Through: None.
UNIVERSAL RESOURCES FZE & ORS .....Defendants
Through: Mr.Peeyush, Mr.Rajiv and Mr.Varun, Advocates for D-4.
CORAM:
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MAY 14, 2025 nc/mjo
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/05/2025 at 13:12:08
1 issue framed by the court
Should the suit be dismissed for want of prosecution given the plaintiff's repeated non-appearance?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ASA Portfolio Pvt Ltd
Universal Resources FZE & Ors
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
