Civil suit dismissed for non-appearance; plaintiff absent despite the matter being called out in the second round, and the court dismissed the suit along with pending applications under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-10
SMT PINKY CHADHA .....Plaintiff
Through: None.
versus
RAKESH MALHOTRA .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Adv with Mr. Shambhu Sharan, Mr. Yaman Kumar, Ms. Sabah Iqbal Siddique and Ms. Samiksha Goel, Advs for D-1. Mr. Anil Pruthi, Adv for D-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 07.04.2025
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
APRIL 7, 2025 aks/sph
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:50:25
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Pinky Chadha
Rakesh Malhotra
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
