Disposed¶18

Ms Neelam Talwar v. Mr Surender Malhotra & Ors.

Delhi HC3 Dec 2025CS(OS)/239/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compromise decree; Order XXIII Rule 3; settlement agreement dated 26.09.2025; DHCMCC mediation; suit decreed in terms of settlement; decree sheet; Neelam Talwar v. Surender Malhotra; CS(OS) 239/2024; I.A. 6650/2024; I.A. 6651/2024; High Court of Delhi; Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Civil suit decreed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 26.09.2025; decree sheet to be drawn; suit and pending applications (I.A. 6650/2024, I.A. 6651/2024) disposed of. ¶18

Ms Neelam Talwar Vs Mr Surender Malhotra & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~O-58

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(OS) 239/2024 and I.A. 6650/2024, I.A. 6651/2024

¶4

MS NEELAM TALWAR .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Ms. Geetanjali Setia, Adv. (Thr. VC)

¶6

versus

¶7

MR SURENDER MALHOTRA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Anirudh Shukla, Adv for D-1. (Thr. VC) Ms. Anju Kalsi, D-2 in person. (Thr. VC) Mr. Deepak Malhotra, D-2(b) in person. (Thr. VC) Ms. Manisha Suir and Mr. Swatej Jetta, Advs for Mr. Rupesh Kohli, D- 3 in person (Thr. VC).

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 03.12.2025

¶10

It is the submitted that the parties have amicably settled their dispute before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (DHCMCC).

¶11

The settlement agreement dated 26.09.2025 has been placed on record. The parties, therefore, request that the suit be decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.

¶12

Order XXIII, Rule 3 authorises the Court to pass a decree on a compromise wherein the parties to the dispute have made an arrangement to

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 11:39:34

¶15

settle the dispute. It has been comprehensively stated in the provision that the settlement arrived at should meet the essentials laid down therein, namely, (i) the compromise is lawful (ii) it is reduced in writing (iii) it is duly signed by the parties arriving at the compromise.

¶16

The settlement has been agreed upon without fear or coercion and the parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition.

¶17

The Court is satisfied that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties following due procedure and meeting the essentials specified Order XXIII, Rule 3. Therefore, the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid settlement agreement.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, the civil suit stands decreed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 26.09.2025.

¶19

Accordingly, let a decree sheet be drawn.

¶20

The civil suit along with the pending applications stands disposed of.

¶21

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶22

DECEMBER 3, 2025 aks/mj

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 11:39:34

Ms Neelam Talwar v. Mr Surender Malhotra & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Neelam Talwar v. Mr Surender Malhotra & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Talkcharge Technologies Private Limited Vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

Seth Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs Satish Kumar Seth & Ors.

Shyam Gopal Dewan Vs Radha Soami Satsang Beas

Amrita Narang Vs Harpal Singh & Anr.

Sh. Narinder Prakash Sharma & Anr. Vs Mrs. Raj Kumari Sharma

Rajat Gangahar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Babita & Ors. Vs Jabbar Singh & Ors.

C & S Electric Ltd. Vs Sunil Bhatia

Sh Chetan Chauhan Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Bobby Aggarwal Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Nayyar (in Judicial Custody) Vs Mrs Dr Manju Nimesh & Anr.