Amit Aggarwal v. Bhagwati Feeds Private Limited

Delhi HC4 Aug 2025CS(COMM)/939/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compromise decree under Order XXIII, Rule 3; settlement agreements dated 14.05.2025; suits decreed in terms of settlement and disposed with pending applications; CS(COMM) 939/2024 and CS(COMM) 955/2024 with I.A. 9085/2025 and I.A. 43420/2024; plaintiffs Amit Aggarwal and Sajan Kumar Agarwal (counsel Amit Sharma); defendant Bhagwati Feeds Private Limited (counsel Vikram Singh Dalal and Pankaj Kumar); High Court of Delhi; Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav; decision date 04.08.2025; decree sheet ordered.

What did the court decide?

Both civil suits stand decreed in terms of the settlement agreements dated 14.05.2025; Registry directed to draw up a decree sheet with the settlement agreements forming part of the decree; suits and pending applications disposed of. ¶¶21

Amit Aggarwal Vs Bhagwati Feeds Private Limited — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~O-76 & 77

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 939/2024 and I.A. 9085/2025 AMIT AGGARWAL .....Plaintiff

¶4

Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

BHAGWATI FEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED, .....Defendant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advs.

¶7

¶8

- CS(COMM) 955/2024 and I.A. 43420/2024 SAJAN KUMAR AGARWAL .....Plaintiff

¶9

Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

¶10

versus

¶11

BHAGWATI FEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advs.

¶12

CORAM:

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 04.08.2025

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties, that both the matters have been settled and the terms of settlement have been recorded vide settlement agreements dated 14.05.2025 and the same have been placed on record.

¶15

Order XXIII, Rule 3 authorises the Court to pass a decree on a compromise wherein the parties to the dispute have made an arrangement to

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:21:47

¶18

settle the dispute. It has been comprehensively stated in the provision that the settlement arrived at should meet the essentials laid down therein, namely, (i) the compromise is lawful (ii) it is reduced in writing (iii) it is duly signed by the parties arriving at the compromise.

¶19

The settlement has been agreed upon without fear or coercion and the parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition.

¶20

The Court is satisfied that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties following due procedure and meeting the essentials specified Order XXIII, Rule 3. Therefore, the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid settlement agreement.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid, the civil suit stands decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.

¶22

The Registry is directed to draw-up a decree sheet. Let the settlement agreements be form part of the decree.

¶23

The civil suit along with the pending applications stands disposed of

¶24

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶25

AUGUST 4, 2025 aks/amg

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:21:47

Amit Aggarwal v. Bhagwati Feeds Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Aggarwal v. Bhagwati Feeds Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Indian Hotels Company Limited Vs Shivgyan Developers Private Limited

Himalaya Wellness Company (Previously Known as the Himalaya Drug Company) & Ors. Vs Shiv Medicare Agencies

M/S Guru Exim Vs Indian Overseas Bank & Anr.

M/S Grovy India Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sh. Subhash Gupta & Ors.

Overdrive Electronics Private Limited Vs Havells India Limited

Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Serialghar.Me & Ors.

Radha Kishan Bishan Dass Rang Rasayan Private Limited Vs Amit Kumar and Anr.

Ss Group Private Limited Vs Sunand Surapaneni Trading as M/S Ss Group and Ors.

L. R. Builders Private Limited Vs P.P. Jewellers Private Limited & Anr.

Nand Kumar Newar Vs Kamal Kumar Newar

M/S Grovy India Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sh. Subhash Gupta & Ors.

Oxbridge Associates Limited Vs Atul Kumra

Sajan Kumar Agarwal Vs Bhagwati Feeds Private Limited

Exclusive Capital Limited Vs Clover Media Private Limited & Ors.