X and Anr. v. Y
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court dismissed the dispute between Hero Investcorp and Nimit Automobile as the parties had settled their differences via a dated July 1, 2025 agreement. The court decreed the suit as a consent decree and ordered a 75% refund of court fees, with half of the refund contributed to the Delhi High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed on terms of settlement; 75% court fees refunded; 50% of refund to welfare fund.
What the court decided
$~29
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 92/2025, I.A. 2833/2025-Stay
HERO INVESTCORP PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Madhav Anand, Mr. Krtin Bhasin, Mr. Yashveer Singh and Mr. Udit Sharma, Advocates
versus
NAMIT AUTOMOBILE .....Defendant Through: Mr. Namit Agarwal, defendant in person through VC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 10.07.2025
- At the outset, learned counsels for the plaintiffs and the defendant submit that the disputes inter se the plaintiffs and the defendant in the present lis have been settled, and the terms thereof have been reduced to writing in the form of the Settlement Agreement dated 01.07.2025, which is forming a part of record. As such, learned counsels for the plaintiffs and the defendant pray for passing a Consent Decree under Order XXIII rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in terms thereof.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit should be decreed as a consent decree based on a settlement agreement.
Whether court fees should be refunded upon amicable settlement of disputes.
Coram
Saurabh Banerjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court