Sukam Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Suvastika Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Sukam Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Suvastika Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Suit decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of prayer clauses 66(a), 66(b) and 66(c) of the plaint; the Settlement Deed dated 27.12.2024 forms part of the decree; contempt application I.A. 15079/2023 disposed of subject to defendants' compliance with Clause 1.9 read with Schedule F within one week; all pending applications disposed of.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Settlement Deed dated 27 December 2024 should be taken on record (I.A. 3018/2025). +2 more

Court's answer

The Settlement Deed dated 27th December, 2024 entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants was taken on record.

Ratio / Principle

The contempt petition was to be withdrawn subject to the defendants fulfilling their commitment in terms of Clause 1.9 read with Schedule F of the Settlement Deed.

Key takeaways

The contempt application was disposed of, the defendants having undertaken through counsel to comply within one week, and their statement was taken on record binding them.ratio¶¶21
Having perused the terms of the Settlement Deed and found them lawful, the court held that the parties shall remain bound by its terms.ratio¶¶26
The suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of prayer clauses 66 (a), 66(b) and 66(c) of the plaint, and the Settlement Deed shall form part of the decree.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Amit Bansal, J.), order dated 04.02.2025: On the basis of a Settlement Deed dated 27 December 2024 executed between the authorised representatives of the plaintiff (Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd) and defendants nos. 3 and 4 (Suvastika Systems Pvt Ltd & Ors.), the court took the Settlement Deed on record (I.A. 3018/2025) and found its terms lawful. The contempt application I.A. 15079/2023 under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC was disposed of, the contempt petition to be withdrawn subject to the defendants fulfilling their commitment in terms of Clause 1.9 read with Schedule F of the Settlement Deed, with counsel undertaking compliance within one week. The suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff in terms of prayer clauses 66(a), 66(b) and 66(c) of the plaint; the Settlement Deed forms part of the decree and all pending applications were disposed of.

$~12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- CS(COMM) 911/2022 & I.A. 15079/2023, I.A. 3018/2025

SU-KAM POWER SYSTEMS LTD

.....Plaintiff

Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita Patro and Ms. Nimrat Singh, Advocates

versus

SUVASTIKA SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Ayush Samaddar and Ms. Vanshika Arora, Advocates Defendant No.3 in person

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 04.02.2025

I.A. 3018/2025 (seeking to bring on record the settlement deed)

This application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff to bring on record the settlement deed dated 27^th December, 2024 (hereinafter “Settlement Deed”), entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants.

For the reasons stated in the application, the Settlement Deed is taken on record.

The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 15079/2023 (under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of CPC)

In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the present contempt petition is to be withdrawn subject to the defendants fulfilling their commitment in terms of Clause 1.9 read with Schedule F of the Settlement Deed.

Page 1 of 2

CS(COMM) 911/2022

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:57:28

Counsel for the defendants submits that the aforesaid compliance will be made within one (1) week from today.

5.1 The statement of the counsel is taken on record. The defendants shall be bound by the same.

In view of the same, the contempt application is disposed of.

CS(COMM) 911/2022

The parties have settled their disputes vide Settlement Deed. The Settlement Deed bears the signatures of the authorised representatives of the plaintiff and defendants no.3 and 4. Defendant no.3 is the Director of the defendant no.1 and the proprietor of the defendant no.2.

Defendant no.3 is present in Court today.

I have perused the terms of the Settlement Deed and find the same to be lawful.

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Deed.

In terms of the settlement, the present suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of prayer clauses 66 (a), 66(b) and 66(c) of the plaint.

The Settlement Deed shall form part of the decree.

Decree sheet be drawn in above terms.

All the pending applications stand disposed of.

AMIT BANSAL, J

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 ds

Page 2 of 2

CS(COMM) 911/2022

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 14:57:28