Disposed

Fever Labs Inc. v. Festival House Immersive Exhibit India Private Limited and Anr.

Delhi HC8 Apr 2025CS(COMM)/88/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commercial suit settled between the parties. The court found the settlement agreement lawful, allowed the consent application, decreed the suit in terms of the agreement and directed refund of 75% of the court fees paid.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025; refund certificate for 75% of court fees issued.

Fever Labs Inc. Vs Festival House Immersive… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~27

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 88/2024

¶4

FEVER LABS INC .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Mr. Mukul Baveja, Ms. Apoorva Murali and Ms. Anshika Chadha, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

FESTIVAL HOUSE IMMERSIVE EXHIBIT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. .....Defendants Through: Appearance not given.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R

¶10

% 08.04.2025

¶11

I.A.9202/2025 (Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)

¶12

Vide the present application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 ( CPC ) the plaintiff is seeking passing of a consent decree based on the Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025, filed along with the present application.

¶13

The present application is duly supported by affidavits of the authorized representatives of the plaintiff.

¶14

Learned counsels of the parties confirm the terms of the settlement and identify the signatures of their respective clients and pray that the suit be decreed in the aforesaid terms as mentioned in Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025.

¶15

This Court has perused the terms of Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025 as recorded inter-se the plaintiff and the defendant and finds them to be lawful.

¶16

In view thereof, the present application is allowed and disposed of.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:47:19

¶18

CS(COMM) 88/2024 & I.A. 2200/2024

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff, in view of the settlement entered inter-se the plaintiff and the defendants, prays that since the dispute inter se them have been settled, he would not press for the other application and prays that the present suit be decreed in the terms of Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025.

¶20

Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025, which shall form a part of the Decree Sheet.

¶21

Needless to mention that the plaintiff and the defendants shall remain bound by the terms of Settlement Agreement dated 30.01.2025.

¶22

Learned counsel for the plaintiff also prays that since the disputes between the parties have been settled amicably, the court fees paid by the plaintiff be refunded in terms of Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. 10. This Court is of the view that since the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and in view of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the plaintiff, refund of 75% of the Court fees paid by the plaintiff is deemed justifiable. 11. Let a Certificate of refund of 75% of the Court fees paid by the plaintiff be prepared by the Registry and handed over to the learned counsel for the plaintiff.

¶23

Registry is directed to draw up Decree Sheet accordingly.

¶24

Accordingly, in view of the above, the present suit, alongwith the pending applications stands disposed of.

¶25

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

¶26

APRIL 8, 2025/ R

¶27

Fever Labs Inc. v. Festival House Immersive Exhibit India Private Limited and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fever Labs Inc. v. Festival House Immersive Exhibit India Private Limited and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tanvi Fitness Private Limited Vs M/S R.M. Foods & Ors.

Bharam Dutt Gupta Vs Sarju Kumar

Novartis Ag Vs Msn Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Derma Concepts & Ors.

Koninklijke Philips N.V. Vs Vivo Mobile Communication Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Vishnu and Company Trademarks Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr. Dharmani Patel @ Dharmani Deni & Ors.

Sanjay Mehra Vs Jagdish Choudhary

Havells India Limited Vs Gurudev Cables, & Ors.

Novartis Ag Vs Msn Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Derma Concepts & Ors.

Spl'S Limited Vs Central Warehousing Corporation & Another

Ihhr Hospitality Ananda Pvt. Ltd. Vs Satyadeo Hospitality Private Limited

Sanjay Mehra Vs Jagdish Choudhary

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd. and Ors. Vs the Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr.