Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Om Prakash Gupta
Case brief
What is this about?
Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Om Prakash Gupta | CS(COMM) 879/2022, IA No.8543/2023 | High Court of Delhi | Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J | 22.09.2025 | suit decreed in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 01.09.2025 (DHC Mediation and Conciliation Centre) | Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC; Section 89 CPC | Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24 (applied) | permanent injunction, prayer Clause 72 (i)-(iv); authentic and genuine Tata products; authorized distributor and agent | delivery up and monetary claims (Clause 72 (v)-(viii)) not pressed | 100% court fee refund, Section 16 and 16A Court Fees Act, 1870 | enforcement of settlement attracts entire court fee liability | digitally signed order.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 01.09.2025: defendant to suffer a decree of permanent injunction in terms of prayer Clause 72 (i)-(iv), restricted to selling authentic and genuine Tata products purchased from an authorized distributor and agent of the plaintiffs; delivery-up and monetary reliefs (prayer Clause 72 (v)-(viii)) disposed of as not pressed; interim orders merged into the final decree; Registry to prepare a decree with the Settlement Agreement forming part of it; 100% court fee refund to plaintiffs within four weeks.