Disposed¶18

Parle Products Private Limited v. Britannia Industries Ltd.

Delhi HC15 Jul 2025CS(COMM)/806/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, CS(COMM) 806/2022, Parle Products Private Limited v. Britannia Industries Ltd., Justice Saurabh Banerjee, order dated 15.07.2025. Suit decreed in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025 reached through Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (DHCMCC); consent decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Decree Sheet to incorporate the settlement; suit and pending applications disposed of. No cases cited, no dissent, no monetary quantum stated in the order.

What did the court decide?

Consent decree passed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025; Registry directed to draw up the Decree Sheet incorporating the Settlement Agreement; captioned suit alongwith pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶18

Parle Products Private Limited Vs Britannia Industries Ltd. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court should pass a consent decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025 arrived at inter se the plaintiff and the defendant before DHCMCC.

¶11

Court's answer

The Court perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025 recorded inter se the plaintiff and the defendant and found them to be lawful.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The present suit was decreed in terms of the settlement arrived at inter se the plaintiff and the defendant, as recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025.

¶18

Key takeaways

The Registry was directed to draw up the Decree Sheet; the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025 shall form part of the Decree Sheet and the parties shall remain bound by its terms.ratio¶20

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Consent decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC - Parle Products Private Limited (plaintiff) and Britannia Industries Ltd. (defendant) informed the Delhi High Court that all their disputes in CS(COMM) 806/2022 had been resolved before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (DHCMCC) and reduced to a written Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025. Counsel made a joint oral prayer for a consent decree in terms of that agreement; the plaintiff stated it did not wish to press any other relief against the defendant, and counsel confirmed the terms and identified their clients' signatures. The Court perused the terms, found them lawful, and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement. The Registry was directed to draw up the Decree Sheet, the Settlement Agreement to form part of it with the parties remaining bound by its terms. The suit, alongwith pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Justice Saurabh Banerjee, 15.07.2025.)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 806/2022, I.A. 19353/2022-Stay, I.A. 20511/2023Addl.doc.

¶4

PARLE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bikash Ghorai, Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj and Ms. Vasupriya Awasthi, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Ishani Chandra, Ms. Shubhie Wahi and Ms. Sanya Kapoor, Advs.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶9

O R D E R % 15.07.2025

¶10

At the outset, learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have since resolved all their disputes before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre ( DHCMCC ) and the terms of the settlement arrived at inter se them have also been reduced to writing in the form of a Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025, which is forming a part of the record.

¶11

Learned counsel for the parties make a joint oral prayer before this Court for the passing of a consent decree under Order XXIII rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in terms of the said Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025.

¶12

Learned counsel for the plaintiff further submits that, in view of the

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:03:52

¶15

settlement arrived inter se the plaintiff and the defendant, the plaintiff does not wish to press for any other relief(s) against the defendant.

¶16

Learned counsel of the plaintiff and the defendant confirm the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025 and identify the signatures of their respective clients thereon as well.

¶17

This Court has perused the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025 as recorded inter se the plaintiff and the defendant and finds them to be lawful.

¶18

Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in terms of the settlement arrived at inter se the plaintiff and the defendant, as recorded in the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025.

¶19

The Registry is directed to draw up the Decree Sheet.

¶20

Needless to say, the Settlement Agreement dated 28.05.2025, shall form a part of the Decree Sheet, and the parties shall remain bound by the terms thereof.

¶21

In view of the above, the captioned suit, alongwith the pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶22

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶23

JULY 15, 2025/Ab

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/07/2025 at 12:03:52

Parle Products Private Limited v. Britannia Industries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parle Products Private Limited v. Britannia Industries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Indiamart Intermesh Limited Vs Just Dial Ltd.

Lotus Herbals Private Limited Vs Dimple Pradipkumar Tanna Trading as Quttix Skin Science & Ors.

Bishan Purohit Vs Mr Nensingh & Ors.

The Indian Performing Right Society Limited Vs Jagaran Prakashan Limited

Paradeep Phosphates Limited Vs Phoenix Plants Lifesavers Private Limited

Tata Sons Private Limited Vs Shrikant Hundia

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. Vs Perilla Life Science P. Ltd. & Anr.

M/S Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Bishan Purohit Vs Mr Nensingh & Ors.

Millennium and Copthorne International Limited Vs Aryans Plaza Services Private Limited & Anr.

Krishna Pal Singh Trading as Sawan Industries Vs M/S Prem Mehandi Centre and Anr.

Vmaps Tech India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bentley Systems Incorporated & Ors.

Voiceage Evs Llc Vs Guangdong Oppo Mobie Telecommunications Corp Ltd. & Ors.

Monsanto Technology Llc Vs the Patent Office