Commercial suit over allegedly infringing products settled in mediation. The Delhi High Court found nothing unlawful in the settlement agreement, decreed the suit in its terms, directed destruction of seized infringing stock and refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE MACALLAN DISTILLERS LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Taaniyaa Dogra and Ms. Anushka Aman, Advocates along with Mr. Pradeep Yadav, A.R. of plaintiff.
versus
RANS CONCEPT DEVELOPERS & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Shashank Sharma, Advocate for D-1, D-5 and D-6 Mr. Raghav Luthra, Advocate for D-2, D-3 and D-4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 07.04.2025
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 787/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:31:12
AMIT BANSAL, J
APRIL 7, 2025 ds
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 787/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:31:12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to decree the commercial suit in terms of the parties' settlement agreement reached in mediation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Macallan Distillers Limited
Rans Concept Developers
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
