Suit decreed in terms of parties' compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC; certain plaint prayers dismissed as not pressed; 50% court fee refund directed under Sections 16/16A of the Court Fees Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
MR. FAZAL MOHAMED YAKUB PATKA AND ORS
.....Defendants Through: Ms. Vani Kaushik, Advocates for D-1 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 10.10.2025
CS(COMM) 591/2025 and I.A. 25234/2025 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)
CS(COMM) 591/2025 Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 13:46:23
is lawful and therefore, there is no impediment in decreeing the suit in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties. The application is signed by the parties and/or their authorized representatives as well as their counsel.
Refund of Court fee
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
OCTOBER 10, 2025/ msh/AM
CS(COMM) 591/2025 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 13:46:23
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the settlement between the parties satisfies Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC so as to decree the suit in its terms.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee on early compromise.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mokobara Lifestyle Private Limited
Mr. Fazal Mohamed Yakub Patka and Ors
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
