Specific performance suit over agricultural land. Plaintiff repeatedly failed to appear, pay imposed costs, or lead evidence; defendants declined to lead evidence and two were ex parte. Court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
Through: None.
versus
SH. SAMARJEET & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi and Mr. Vishesh Chauhan, Advocates for D-2 and 4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 17.04.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:46:58
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 544/2017
4 stated that they did not wish to lead evidence. Defendants No. 1 and 3 had been proceeded ex parte on 29.01.2019. In light of this development and considering that Plaintiff was unrepresented and its evidence stood closed, learned Joint Registrar placed the matter before this Court for directions.
JYOTI SINGH, J
APRIL 17, 2025 S.Sharma/shivam
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2025 at 15:46:58
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 544/2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-prosecution given the plaintiff's continued non-appearance and failure to lead evidence.
Sh. Samarjeet
Defendants No. 2 and 4
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
