Advocate for the plaintiff sought discharge from representing the plaintiff in a commercial suit. Counsel was discharged as the plaintiff did not appear despite service; the suit and pending applications were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
Versus
KOO COIN AND OTHERS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. D. Dutta, Mr. Arjun Mookerjee & Mr. Yogesh Singh, Advocates for D-4. Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, Mr. Kushagra Kumar & Mr. Kumar Rana, Advocates for R-14.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
O R D E R % 19.08.2025
IA No.43129/2024
CS(COMM) 524/2022 & I.A. 12232/2023
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2025 at 12:13:51
No.43129/2024 above and since none appears for the Plaintiff despite service of the Court Notice, the Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending Applications stand disposed of.
TEJAS KARIA, J
AUGUST 19, 2025 ‘gsr’
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2025 at 12:13:51
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bombinate Technologies Private Limited
Koo Coin and Others
Tejas Karia
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
