Plaintiffs in a commercial suit submitted that relief sought had already been granted through earlier orders and did not wish to pursue the suit further. The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit accordingly without adjudicating any issue.
Suit disposed of as plaintiffs chose not to pursue it, relief having been granted by prior orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
STAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Akshay Maloo, Advocate.
versus
CRICHD SC & ORS. .....Defendants
Through: Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Debarshi Dutta, Mr. Arjun Mookerjee and Ms. Nikita Rathi, Advocates for D-23. Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Ms. Harshista Chaturvedi and Ms. Usha, Advocates for D-39 and D-40.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 06.05.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J
MAY 6, 2025 Vivek/-
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2025 at 16:02:17
Star India Private Limited & Anr.
Crichd SC & Ors.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
