Plaintiffs' civil suit was disposed of as its assertions and relief were amenable to NCLT adjudication, with insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code already under way against the plaintiff. Rights and contentions of parties were reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-10
Through: Mr. Himanshu Singhal, Adv.
versus
BANK OF BAHRAIN AND KUWAIT BSC .....Defendant Through: Mr. Rajeev Pandey and Mr. Nirmal Mishra, Advs for D-1.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 14.10.2025
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
OCTOBER 14, 2025/ aks/mj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 14:00:03
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit's assertions and reliefs fall within NCLT adjudication given pending IBC proceedings against the plaintiff.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CMI Limited
Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait BSC
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
