Commercial suit over trade mark dispute settled in mediation. Court recorded the Settlement Agreement, directed release of seized goods to defendants on destruction of packaging, noted withdrawal of trade mark applications, and ordered refund of 100% court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
M/S TEJ RAM DHARAM PAUL & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate
versus
M/S MA MAJISHA INDUSTRIES LLP & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kumar Vivek Vibhu, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 20.03.2025
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 350/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 14:33:08
who shall destroy the packaging of such goods.
AMIT BANSAL, J
MARCH 20, 2025 ds
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 350/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 14:33:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mediated settlement dated 24 February 2025 is lawful and should be made part of the decree.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S TEJ RAM DHARAM PAUL & ANR.
M/S MA MAJISHA INDUSTRIES LLP & ORS.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
