Summary judgment application under Order XIII-A CPC in an IP suit. Defendants no. 1 to 3 raised no objection to permanent injunction and denied owning the impugned website. Court decreed the suit in terms of prayer clauses 71(i) and 71(ii); remaining reliefs not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
versus
RAJNIGANDHA DISTRIBUTORS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate for D-1 to 3.
Mr. Premtosh K. Mishra, CGSC, Mr. Manish Vashisht & Ms. Sanya Kalsi, Advocates for GNCTD.
%
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R 18.02.2025
I.A. 5859/2024 (u/O XIII-A Rules 3 & 6(1)(a) r/w Order VIII Rule 10 & Section 151 of CPC, 1908)
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 317/2019
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 11:09:15
passed.
CS(COMM) 317/2019
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2025 S.Sharma
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 317/2019
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 11:09:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a summary judgment of permanent injunction should be passed against defendants no. 1 to 3 who do not contest the suit reliefs.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharampal Satyapal Limited
Rajnigandha Distributors Private Limited
GNCTD
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
