Plaintiff sought to withdraw its suit before the Delhi High Court; the court dismissed the suit as withdrawn and disposed of all pending applications.
Suit permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
VIACOM 18 MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Priyansh Kohli and Mr. Yatinder Garg, Advocates
versus
JOHN DOE & ORS. .....Defendants
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 15.04.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J APRIL 15, 2025 ds
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/04/2025 at 12:46:53
Viacom 18 Media Private Limited
John Doe & Ors.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
