Flamagas, S.A & Anr. v. Siddharth Sethi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The plaintiff withdrew the suit against defendant no. 4 relying on a prior order that no case of passing off or infringement was made out. The Court dismissed the suit as withdrawn against defendant no. 4 without reserving liberty to the plaintiff and disposed of pending applications.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed as withdrawn against defendant no. 4; no liberty reserved to plaintiff; pending applications disposed of.
What the court decided
$~6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 1204/2016 & I.A. 10771/2016
FLAMAGAS, S.A & ANR. .....Plaintiffs
- Through: Mr. Samik Mukherjee, Advocate (Through VC)
versus
SIDDHARTH SETHI & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. A. P. Dhamija, Advocate with Ms. Taniya Sharma and Mr. Sunny, Advocates for D-4 (Through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 09.12.2025
CS(COMM) 1204/2016
- Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the present suit survives only against defendant no. 4.
- He states that he has taken instructions and seeks liberty to withdraw the suit vis-à-vis defendant no. 4.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Flamasagas, S.A & Anr.
- respondent
Siddharth Sethi & Ors.
Coram
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court