Petitioner sought setting aside of Family Court orders and permission to argue on merits, but withdrew the petition after partial arguments; the High Court dismissed the petition and accompanying applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~78
MOHD. SHAHID JAMAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shah Rukh Ahmad, Advocate (through VC)
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R
CRL.M.A. 10787/2025 (exemption)
CRL.M.A. 10788/2025 (for condonation of delay of 70 days in filing), CRL.M.A. 10789/2025 (for condonation of delay of 62 days in re-filing) & CRL.M.A. 10786/2025 (stay)
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J APRIL 8, 2025/‘ rs’
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:29:47
Mohd. Shahid Jamal
The State NCT of Delhi
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
