Revision petition challenging a directive to pay litigation expenses in matrimonial proceedings was withdrawn by counsel after partial address.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 18.03.2025
[ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
MARCH 18, 2025/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2025 at 12:17:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petitioner's challenge to the order requiring him to pay litigation expenses to his wife should be pursued?
Udit Mittal
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Anr
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
