Restoration application allowed and criminal revision restored; exemption application allowed. Petitioner then sought withdrawal citing a mediated settlement agreement for mutual consent divorce; the revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
KAPIL BHATI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Palak Munjal and Mr. Prince Choudhary, Advocates
versus
JYOTI CHOUDHARY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms Gunjan Sinha Jain Advocate appointed by DHCLSC
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 13.01.2025
CRL.M.A. 38896/2024 (for restoration)
CRL.M.A. 38897/2024 (exemption)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:51:01
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
JANUARY 13, 2025/ns
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:51:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the restoration application for the dismissed revision petition should be allowed, and whether the petition should be withdrawn in view of a mediated settlement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kapil Bhati
Jyoti Choudhary
Anr.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
