Disposed
Ratna Sunder v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P./618/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition rendered infructuous as the trial in the underlying criminal proceedings was concluded and the petitioner was acquitted by the trial court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~23
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.REV.P. 618/2019 & CRL.M.A. 11123/2019 RATNA SUNDER .....Petitioner
¶4
- Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with Ms. Shehnaz Khan, Advocate for the State. SI Rohit, PS: Rajouri Garden.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R
¶8
- % 09.05.2025
¶9
- The present petition is directed against order dated 14th November, 2018, wherein the Petitioner was charged for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n)/377/342/323/328/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
¶10
- However, during the pendency of the present proceedings, the trial stood concluded and by order dated 28th August, 2024, the Petitioner has been acquitted.
¶11
- In light of the above, the relief sought in the present petition is rendered infructuous. It is for this reason perhaps that there has been no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner for the last two dates, 22nd October, 2024 and 11th February, 2025. The same position continues today.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ratna Sunder
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Sanjeev Narula
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court