Petitioner sought to withdraw a revision petition, the application for bringing legal representatives on record having been allowed by the Executing Court. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
SHRI PARSHOTTAM PARKASH AND ANOTHER (DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar and Mr. Vikas Pal, Advocates
versus
SHRI VIKRAM PRAKASH .....Respondent Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 05.03.2025
Learned counsel for the Petitioner states the that Petitioner has instructions to withdraw the present petition, as the application for bringing the legal representatives on record has been allowed by the Executing Court.
The petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application, if any.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
MARCH 5, 2025/ rhc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:34:37
Shri Parshottam Parkash
Shri Vikram Prakash
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
