Dismissed
Manoj Mehra v. Rajni and Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P./302/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Criminal revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even on second call, indicating he did not wish to pursue the matter.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~24
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.REV.P. 302/2023 & CRL.M.A. 7486/2023
¶4
MANOJ MEHRA .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
RAJNI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
¶9
O R D E R % 03.02.2025
¶10
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on second call. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further.
¶11
Accordingly, the petition along with pending application(s) is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶12
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Manoj Mehra
- respondent
Rajni
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court