Dismissed
Vivek Ratna v. the State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.REV.P./226/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Criminal revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two calls, with pending applications also dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~31
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.REV.P. 226/2023 & CRL.M.A. 5911/2023
¶4
VIVEK RATNA
¶5
.....Petitioner
¶6
Through: None
¶7
versus
¶8
THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State along with SI Sachin Dhama, Advocate
¶9
Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Ms. Prachi Nirwan, Advocates for R-2
¶10
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
¶11
O R D E R
¶12
%
¶13
17.02.2025
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vivek Ratna
- respondent
The State
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court