Mentioning-driven corrigendum to an earlier disposed revision petition judgment: the Amicus Curiae who argued for the prosecutrix was inadvertently omitted from the prior judgment's record. The bench heard him and directed that his presence be marked in the judgment dated 21.04.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~mentioning
MANISH @ MAHESH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Akshya, Adv.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Priyanka Saini.
Mr. Abhishek Mahajan, Amicus Curiae for Prosecutrix.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 20.05.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2025 at 13:41:46
judgment dated 21.04.2025.
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MAY 20, 2025/ns
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2025 at 13:41:46
MANISH @ MAHESH
STATE NCT OF DELHI
Abhishek Mahajan (Amicus Curiae for Prosecutrix)
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
